Poisson regression is the most extensively used model for modeling data that are measured as counts. The main characteristic of Poisson regression model is the equidispersion limitation in which the mean and variance of the count variable are the same. However, in many situations the variance of the count variable is greater than the mean which causes overdispersion, and hence, poor fit will be resulted when inference about regression parameters. Alternatively, the negative binomial regression is preferred when overdispersion is present. In addition, in particular cases, the zero counts are not observed in data which is known as zero-truncation. In the presence of overdispersion in zero-truncated count data, the zero-truncated negative binomial (ZTNB) regression model can be used as an alternative to zero-truncated Poisson (ZTP) regression model. In this paper, for testing overdispersion in ZTNB regression model against ZTP regression model, the likelihood ratio test (LRT), score test, and Wald test are proposed. A Monte-Carlo simulation is carried out in order to examine the empirical power for statistics of these tests under different levels of overdispersion and various sample sizes. The simulation results indicate that Wald test is more powerful than the LRT and score test for detecting the overdispersion parameter in ZTNB regression model against ZTP regression model, since it provides the highest statistical power. Thus, the Wald test is preferable for detecting the overdispersion problem in zero-truncated count data.
Published in | American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13 |
Page(s) | 152-157 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Count Regression, Zero-Truncated Poisson, Overdispersion, Likelihood Ratio Test, Score Test, Wald Test
[1] | Arrabal, C. T., Silva, K. P., & Bandeira, L. N. (2014). Zero-truncated negative binomial applied to nonlinear data. JP Journal of Biostatistics, 11 (1): 55-67. |
[2] | Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29-53. |
[3] | Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1990). Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 347-364. |
[4] | Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press. |
[5] | Dean, C. B. (1992). Testing for overdispersion in Poisson and binomial regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87 (418): 451-457. |
[6] | Dean, C. B., & Lawless, J. F. (1989). Tests for detecting overdispersion in Poisson regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84 (406): 467-472. |
[7] | Grogger, J. T., & Carson, R. T. (1991). Models for truncated counts. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6, 225-238. |
[8] | Gurmu, S. (1991). Tests for detecting overdispersion in the positive Poisson regression model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 9 (2): 215-222. |
[9] | Gurmu, S., & Trivedi, P. K. (1992). Overdispersion tests for truncated Poisson regression models. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 347-370. |
[10] | Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press. |
[11] | Hossain, Z., Akter, R., Sultana, N., & Kabir, E. (2020). Modelling zero-truncated overdispersed antenatal health care count data of women in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 15 (1): 1-10. |
[12] | Ismah, Kurnia, A., & Sadik, K. (2020). Analysis of overdispersed count data by Poisson model. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7 (10): 1400-1409. |
[13] | Johnson, N. L., Kemp, A. W., & Kotz, S. (2005). Univariate discrete distributions. 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. |
[14] | Lee, L.-F. (1986). Specification test for Poisson regression models. International Economic Review, 27 (3): 689-706. |
[15] | Lee, J.-H., Han, G., Fulp, W. J., & Giuliano, A. R. (2012). Analysis of overdispersed count data: application to the human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM) study. Epidemiology and Infection, 140, 1087-1094. |
[16] | Matthews, J. N. S., & Appleton, D. R. (1993). An application of the truncated Poisson distribution to immunogold assay. Biometrics, 49 (2): 617-621. |
[17] | Molla, D. T., & Muniswamy, B. (2012). Power of tests for overdispersion parameter in negative binomial regression model. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 1 (4): 29-36. |
[18] | O’Hara Hines, R. J. (1997). A comparison of tests for overdispersion in generalized linear models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 58 (4): 323-342. |
[19] | Pongsapukdee, V., Khawsittiwong, P., & Yamjaroenkit, M. (2016). Test statistics for dispersion parameter in Poisson regression and generalized Poisson regression models. Silpakorn University Science and Technology Journal, 10 (2): 31-36. |
[20] | Sampford, M. R. (1955). The truncated negative binomial distribution. Biometrika, 42 (1-2): 58-69. |
[21] | Shaw, D. (1988). On-site samples’ regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification. Journal of Econometrics, 37 (2): 211-223. |
[22] | Singh, J. (1978). A characterization of positive Poisson distribution and its application. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 34 (3): 545-548. |
[23] | Vives, J., Losilla, J.-M., Rodrigo, M.-F., & Portell, M. (2008). Overdispersion tests in count-data analysis. Psychological Reports, 103, 145-160. |
[24] | Winkelmann, R. (2008). Econometric analysis of count data. 5th edition, Springer. |
[25] | Yang, Z., Hardin, J. W., Addy, C. L., & Vuong, Q. H. (2007). Testing approaches for overdispersion in Poisson regression versus the generalized Poisson model. Biometrical Journal, 49 (4): 565-584. |
[26] | Yang, Z., Hardin, J. W., & Addy, C. L. (2009). A score test for overdispersion in Poisson regression based on the generalized Poisson-2 model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139, 1514-1521. |
[27] | Zamani, H., & Ismail, N. (2013). Score test for testing Poisson regression against generalized Poisson alternatives. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1522, 1204-1212. |
[28] | Zhang, H., Pounds, S. B., & Tang, L. (2013). Statistical methods for overdispersion in mRNA-Seq count data. The Open Bioinformatics Journal, 7, 34-40. |
[29] | Zhao, W., Feng, Y., & Li, Z. (2010). Zero-truncated generalized Poisson regression model and its score tests. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 1, 17-23. |
APA Style
Enas Gawdat Yehia. (2021). Power of Overdispersion Tests in Zero-Truncated Negative Binomial Regression Model. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 10(3), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13
ACS Style
Enas Gawdat Yehia. Power of Overdispersion Tests in Zero-Truncated Negative Binomial Regression Model. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2021, 10(3), 152-157. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13
AMA Style
Enas Gawdat Yehia. Power of Overdispersion Tests in Zero-Truncated Negative Binomial Regression Model. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2021;10(3):152-157. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13, author = {Enas Gawdat Yehia}, title = {Power of Overdispersion Tests in Zero-Truncated Negative Binomial Regression Model}, journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {152-157}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtas.20211003.13}, abstract = {Poisson regression is the most extensively used model for modeling data that are measured as counts. The main characteristic of Poisson regression model is the equidispersion limitation in which the mean and variance of the count variable are the same. However, in many situations the variance of the count variable is greater than the mean which causes overdispersion, and hence, poor fit will be resulted when inference about regression parameters. Alternatively, the negative binomial regression is preferred when overdispersion is present. In addition, in particular cases, the zero counts are not observed in data which is known as zero-truncation. In the presence of overdispersion in zero-truncated count data, the zero-truncated negative binomial (ZTNB) regression model can be used as an alternative to zero-truncated Poisson (ZTP) regression model. In this paper, for testing overdispersion in ZTNB regression model against ZTP regression model, the likelihood ratio test (LRT), score test, and Wald test are proposed. A Monte-Carlo simulation is carried out in order to examine the empirical power for statistics of these tests under different levels of overdispersion and various sample sizes. The simulation results indicate that Wald test is more powerful than the LRT and score test for detecting the overdispersion parameter in ZTNB regression model against ZTP regression model, since it provides the highest statistical power. Thus, the Wald test is preferable for detecting the overdispersion problem in zero-truncated count data.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Power of Overdispersion Tests in Zero-Truncated Negative Binomial Regression Model AU - Enas Gawdat Yehia Y1 - 2021/06/21 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13 T2 - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics JF - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics JO - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics SP - 152 EP - 157 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9006 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20211003.13 AB - Poisson regression is the most extensively used model for modeling data that are measured as counts. The main characteristic of Poisson regression model is the equidispersion limitation in which the mean and variance of the count variable are the same. However, in many situations the variance of the count variable is greater than the mean which causes overdispersion, and hence, poor fit will be resulted when inference about regression parameters. Alternatively, the negative binomial regression is preferred when overdispersion is present. In addition, in particular cases, the zero counts are not observed in data which is known as zero-truncation. In the presence of overdispersion in zero-truncated count data, the zero-truncated negative binomial (ZTNB) regression model can be used as an alternative to zero-truncated Poisson (ZTP) regression model. In this paper, for testing overdispersion in ZTNB regression model against ZTP regression model, the likelihood ratio test (LRT), score test, and Wald test are proposed. A Monte-Carlo simulation is carried out in order to examine the empirical power for statistics of these tests under different levels of overdispersion and various sample sizes. The simulation results indicate that Wald test is more powerful than the LRT and score test for detecting the overdispersion parameter in ZTNB regression model against ZTP regression model, since it provides the highest statistical power. Thus, the Wald test is preferable for detecting the overdispersion problem in zero-truncated count data. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -