This study systematically evaluated the implementation of fortification practices, including quality assurance and quality control, among small-scale processors to ensure regulatory compliance. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in Ubungo district (Dar es Salaam) and Morogoro municipality, Tanzania, involving 38 processors. Data collection relied on observational checklists and IBM SPSS ® version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics revealed critical insights. Cleanliness and sanitation standards were met in only 36.8% of warehouses and 42.1% of production areas, underscoring hygiene deficiencies. Alarmingly, 26.3% of micronutrient premixes were inappropriately stored near heat-generating milling machines. Written procedures for quality assurance and quality control were virtually absent, with just 2.6% of processors having such documentation. A mere 13.2% of processors conducted quality checks on fortified maize flour to confirm micronutrient presence. This study identified pervasive shortcomings in quality control and assurance practices among small-scale processors. Hindrances included inadequate training in fortification standards, limited processing capacity, and constrained access to quality control facilities. Strengthening these practices is imperative to ensure the consistent delivery of safe, high-quality fortified maize flour, essential for the nutritional well-being of target populations. This action holds significant public health and food safety implications.
Published in | Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12 |
Page(s) | 166-173 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fortification, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Practices, Small-Scale Processors
[1] | Akyar, I. (2012). Standard operating procedures (what are they good for?). Latest research into quality control, 12, 367-391. |
[2] | Allen, L. (2006). Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. (No Title). |
[3] | Allen, L. H. (2006). New approaches for designing and evaluating food fortification programs. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(4), 1055-1058. |
[4] | Berger, J. (2009). National fortification of wheat flour and oil with micronutrients in Morocco: 2005–2008 project supported by GAIN. Geneva: Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition. |
[5] | Boniface, M. G. (2021). Compliance of fortified maize flour with Tanzania standard for small scale food processors in Morogoro and Dar es Salaam regions (Masters dissertation, Sokoine University of Agriculture). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=COMPLIANCE+OF+FORTIFIED+MAIZE+FLOUR+WITH+TANZANIA+STANDARD+FOR+SMALL+SCALE+FOOD+PROCESSORS+IN+MOROGORO+AND+DAR+ES+SALAAM+REGIONS&btnG= Accessed on September 7, 2023. |
[6] | Coelho, M. (2002). Vitamin stability in premixes and feeds: A practical approach in ruminant diets. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th annual florida ruminant nutrition symposium. |
[7] | Danster-Christians, N. (2015). The knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding food fortification among mill managers and the contribution of maize meal to the micronutrient intake of a national sample of South African adults. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University, |
[8] | Dary, O., & Hurrell, R. (2006). Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. World Health Organization, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006, 1-376. |
[9] | Dunn, M. L., Jain, V., & Klein, B. P. (2014). Stability of key micronutrients added to fortified maize flours and corn meal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1312(1), 15-25. |
[10] | EAS. (2000). EAS 39: East Africa Standard on Hygiene in the food and drink manufacturing industry - Code of practice - EAS 39 East African Community, 23. |
[11] | ECSA. (2007). Manual for internal monitoring of fortified wheat flour–quality assurance and quality control, QA/QC.. Arusha: East, Central and Southern African Health Community. |
[12] | Fellows, P., Axtell, B., & Dillon, M. (1995). Quality assurance for small-scale rural food industries: Food & Agriculture Org. |
[13] | Johnson, Q. W., & Wesley, A. S. (2010). Miller's best/enhanced practices for flour fortification at the flour mill. Food and nutrition bulletin, 31(1_suppl1), S75-S85. |
[14] | Khamila, S., Sila, D., & Makokha, A. (2020). Compliance status and stability of vitamins and minerals in Fortified Maize Flour in Kenya. Scientific African, 8, e00384. |
[15] | Kuong, K., Laillou, A., Chea, C., Chamnan, C., Berger, J., & Wieringa, F. T. (2016). Stability of vitamin A, iron and zinc in fortified rice during storage and its impact on future national standards and programs—case study in Cambodia. Nutrients, 8(1), 51. |
[16] | Luthringer, C. L., Rowe, L. A., Vossenaar, M., & Garrett, G. S. (2015). Regulatory monitoring of fortified foods: identifying barriers and good practices. Global Health: Science and Practice, 3(3), 446-461. |
[17] | Mark, H. E., Assiene, J. G., Luo, H., Nankap, M., Ndjebayi, A., Ngnie-Teta, I.,... Brown, K. H. (2019). Monitoring of the national oil and wheat flour fortification program in Cameroon using a program impact pathway approach. Current developments in nutrition, 3(8), nzz076. |
[18] | Martin, N., Mokaya, J., Smith, E. G. & HKI (2016). Small and Medium Scale Fortification of maize flour in Kenya and Tanzania. |
[19] | Mohammadien, H. A., Hussein, M. T., & El-Sokkary, R. T. (2013). Effects of exposure to flour dust on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function of mill workers. Egyptian journal of chest diseases and tuberculosis, 62(4), 745-753. |
[20] | Philar, R., Johnson, Q., Ranum, P., & Wesley, A. S. (2005). Small scale mill fortification manual. Ottawa, Canada: The Micronutrient Initiative. |
[21] | Sunley, N., & Umunna, L. (2010). Strengthening monitoring and compliance within the South African Food Fortification Program. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition as a contribution to strengthening monitoring and quality control of wheat and maize flour fortification in South Africa. |
[22] | TBS. (2018). TZS 328-Tanzania Standard on Fortified milled maize (corn) products - TZS 328. Tanzania Bureau of Standards. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS), 9. |
[23] | UNIDO. (2004). Small-scale Cereal Milling and Bakery Products Production methods, equipment and quality assurance practices. Small scale cereal milling and bakery products. |
[24] | WHO. (2021). Monitoring flour fortification to maximize health benefits: a manual for millers, regulators, and programme managers. |
[25] | Wilson, R. T., & Lewis, J. (2015). The maize value chain in Tanzania. A Report from the Southern Highlands Food Systems Program. Rome: FAO. |
[26] | Wirth, J. P., Nichols, E., Mas’d, H., Barham, R., Johnson, Q. W., & Serdula, M. (2013). External mill monitoring of wheat flour fortification programs: an approach for program managers using experiences from Jordan. Nutrients, 5(11), 4741-4759. |
APA Style
Issa-Zacharia, A., Mareni, G. B. (2023). Voluntary Maize Flour Fortification in Tanzania: Adequacy of Small-Scale Processors' Implementation of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programmes. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 11(6), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12
ACS Style
Issa-Zacharia, A.; Mareni, G. B. Voluntary Maize Flour Fortification in Tanzania: Adequacy of Small-Scale Processors' Implementation of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programmes. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2023, 11(6), 166-173. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12
AMA Style
Issa-Zacharia A, Mareni GB. Voluntary Maize Flour Fortification in Tanzania: Adequacy of Small-Scale Processors' Implementation of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programmes. J Food Nutr Sci. 2023;11(6):166-173. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12
@article{10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12, author = {Abdulsudi Issa-Zacharia and Gudila Boniface Mareni}, title = {Voluntary Maize Flour Fortification in Tanzania: Adequacy of Small-Scale Processors' Implementation of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programmes}, journal = {Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {6}, pages = {166-173}, doi = {10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfns.20231106.12}, abstract = {This study systematically evaluated the implementation of fortification practices, including quality assurance and quality control, among small-scale processors to ensure regulatory compliance. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in Ubungo district (Dar es Salaam) and Morogoro municipality, Tanzania, involving 38 processors. Data collection relied on observational checklists and IBM SPSS ® version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics revealed critical insights. Cleanliness and sanitation standards were met in only 36.8% of warehouses and 42.1% of production areas, underscoring hygiene deficiencies. Alarmingly, 26.3% of micronutrient premixes were inappropriately stored near heat-generating milling machines. Written procedures for quality assurance and quality control were virtually absent, with just 2.6% of processors having such documentation. A mere 13.2% of processors conducted quality checks on fortified maize flour to confirm micronutrient presence. This study identified pervasive shortcomings in quality control and assurance practices among small-scale processors. Hindrances included inadequate training in fortification standards, limited processing capacity, and constrained access to quality control facilities. Strengthening these practices is imperative to ensure the consistent delivery of safe, high-quality fortified maize flour, essential for the nutritional well-being of target populations. This action holds significant public health and food safety implications. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Voluntary Maize Flour Fortification in Tanzania: Adequacy of Small-Scale Processors' Implementation of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Programmes AU - Abdulsudi Issa-Zacharia AU - Gudila Boniface Mareni Y1 - 2023/11/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12 T2 - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences JF - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences JO - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences SP - 166 EP - 173 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7293 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20231106.12 AB - This study systematically evaluated the implementation of fortification practices, including quality assurance and quality control, among small-scale processors to ensure regulatory compliance. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in Ubungo district (Dar es Salaam) and Morogoro municipality, Tanzania, involving 38 processors. Data collection relied on observational checklists and IBM SPSS ® version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics revealed critical insights. Cleanliness and sanitation standards were met in only 36.8% of warehouses and 42.1% of production areas, underscoring hygiene deficiencies. Alarmingly, 26.3% of micronutrient premixes were inappropriately stored near heat-generating milling machines. Written procedures for quality assurance and quality control were virtually absent, with just 2.6% of processors having such documentation. A mere 13.2% of processors conducted quality checks on fortified maize flour to confirm micronutrient presence. This study identified pervasive shortcomings in quality control and assurance practices among small-scale processors. Hindrances included inadequate training in fortification standards, limited processing capacity, and constrained access to quality control facilities. Strengthening these practices is imperative to ensure the consistent delivery of safe, high-quality fortified maize flour, essential for the nutritional well-being of target populations. This action holds significant public health and food safety implications. VL - 11 IS - 6 ER -