The study is to describe the marketing system of inputs and outputs; identify weather there is marketing system inefficiencies and integration in inputs and outputs of maize and tomato marketing system in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida districts. From the result, there is an information gap with and among producers, Development Agents, input suppliers, traders, and consumers. The majority of the producers preferred cooperatives to sell their products. According to producers’ reported disease, low price of grain, poor market linkage, shortage of chemicals and unlicensed traders were the major challenges in both maize and tomato production. Shortage of inputs, farmers reluctant to buy inputs, high competition unlicensed traders, weak government support, and shortage of storage were the main challenges in input supply while low quality with poor awareness, low supply, unlicensed traders, brokers and demand fluctuations were also major challenges in traders. Enhancing the technical knowledge and skill of farmers, Development Agents, input suppliers, and buyers need the training to provide effective enabling service to increase market efficiency among the actors. Besides, build the capacity of farmer’s cooperatives in value chains of inputs and outputs, considering market-oriented extension service and improving the enabling environment in promoting competition in agribusiness marketing efficiency.
Published in | Journal of Investment and Management (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12 |
Page(s) | 47-55 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Input-output, Maize, Marketing Information, Selling and Tomato
[1] | Berhanu G., Fernandez-Rivera S., Mohammed H., Mwangi W. and Seid A. (2007). Maize and Livestock: Their Inter-Linked Roles in Meeting Human Needs in Ethiopia. Research Report 6. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya. 103 pp. |
[2] | Dagnachew L., Tesfaye A., Tilahun G., Dereje W., Tafa J. Tesfaye L., Teha M., Kamil A., Tilahun G. and Shure S. (2018). Participatory Identification of Agricultural Production Constraints: The Case of Oromia, Harari and Dire Dawa, 23-24 Nov 2017, Finfinnee, Ethiopia. |
[3] | Ambecha O. G., Paul C. S. and Bezabih E. (2012). Tomato production in Ethiopia: constraints and opportunities. |
[4] | Eyob B., Tesfaye H. and Dejene H. (2014). Growth and Instability in Area, Yield and Production of Tomato in Ethiopia. Int. Jour. Dev. Res., 4 (11): 2215-2218. |
[5] | Beza E., Degye G. and Moti J. (2016). Value Chain Analysis of Maize: The Case of Bako Tibe and Gobu Sayo Districts in Central West Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 23 (7): 18-27. |
[6] | Abate T., Bekele S., Abebe M., Dagne W., Yilma K., Kindie T., Menale K., Gezahegn B., Berhanu T. and Tolera K. (2015). Factors that Transformed Maize Productivity in Ethiopia. Food Security, 7 (5), 965–981. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0488-z. |
[7] | FAO and WFP (Food and Agricultural Organization and World Food Programme) (2012). Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to Ethiopia. Special Report of Food and Agriculture Organization and World Food Programme. |
[8] | Roger L. (2007). Marketing Systems-A Core Macro Marketing Concept. Journal of Macro marketing, 27 (3): 227-242. |
[9] | Singh S. (2008). Rural Marketing: Focus on Agricultural inputs, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi. |
[10] | Denning G., Kabambe P., Sanchez P., Malik A., Flor R., Harawa R., Nkhoma P. (2009). Input Subsidies to Improve Smallholder Maize Productivity in Malawi: Toward an African Green Revolution. PLoS Biology, 7 (1). |
[11] | Jack K. (2013). Constraints on the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries. Literature review, Agricultural Technology Adoption Initiative, J-PAL and CEGA. |
[12] | Priyono M. M. (2013). Analysis of Traditional Market Development Strategy in The District Sidoarjo. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. |
[13] | Benson M., Willy M. and Charles R. (2015). Effect of Market Development Strategy on Performance in Sugar Industry in Kenya |
[14] | Hean T. H., Singfat C. and Jiye X. (2006). Efficiency, Effectiveness and Productivity of Marketing in Services. |
[15] | Gao Y. (2010). Measuring Marketing Performance: A Review and a Framework: The Marketing Review, 2010, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 25-40. DOI: 10.1362/146934710X488924. |
[16] | Kothari C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2nd Revised Edition. New Age International Publisher. Rajasthan University: Jaipur, India. |
[17] | UN (2010). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. |
[18] | Kanyamuka J. S., Jumbe C. B. and Ricker-Gilbert J. (2018). Making Agricultural Input Subsidies More Effective and Profitable in Africa: The Role of Complementary Interventions: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3631-4.ch008. |
[19] | Ang A., Goetzmann W. and Schaefer S. (2010). The Efficient Market Theory and Evidence: Implications for Active Investment Management, Foundations and Trends in Finance 5: 3, pp 157– 242. |
[20] | Williamson O. E. (2009). New Taking Institutional Economics: Ahead Looking. Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3), 595–613. |
[21] | Melesse B. (2018). A Review on Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural New Technologies in Ethiopia. J Agri Sci Food Res; 9 (3): 226. |
[22] | Berhanu G., Hoe K. D. and Azage T. (2006). Commercialization of Ethiopian Agriculture: Extension Service from Input Supplier to Knowledge Broker and Facilitator. IPMS of Ethiopian Farmers’ Project Working Paper 1. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya. 36p. |
[23] | Ramon P. D. (2005). Market Imperfections: Working Paper; Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, |
[24] | Ataklite B. (2016). Agricultural Transformation in Ethiopia: State Policy and Smallholder Farming: www.eedboos.net. |
[25] | Matsumoto T and Yamano T. (2011). The Impacts of Fertilizer Credit on Crop Production and Income in Ethiopia. In Emerging Development of Agriculture in East Africa (pp. 59-72). Springer, Dordrecht. |
[26] | Awotide B. A., Abdoulaye T., Alene A. D. and Manyong V. M. (2015). Impact of Access to Credit on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Smallholder Cassava Farmers in Nigeria. DOI: 10.22004/ag.ecom.2069. |
[27] | Shaun F., Peter R., Rupert B., Don S., Abbi B., Jefferson S. and Emily W. (2014). Linking Smallholder Farmers to Markets and the Implications for Extension and Advisory Services. |
[28] | Peter N., Shedrack W. and John H. (2015). First Mile Transport Challenges for Smallholder Tomato Farmers, Kilolo District Tanzania. IFRTD, Kenya. |
[29] | Mkonda Y. M. and He, X. (2016). Production Trends of Food Crops: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects to Improve Tanzanian Rural Livelihoods. Natural Resources and Conservation; 4 (4): 51-59. |
[30] | Umar B. B. (2016). Seasonal Challenges and Opportunities for Smallholder Farmers in a Mining District of Zambia. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11 (13). |
[31] | Kiros G. and Ashenafi K. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities of Genetically Modified Crops Production; Future Perspectives in Ethiopia, Review. The Open Agriculture Journal. DOI: 10.2174/1874331501819010240. |
APA Style
Kifle Degefa, Getachew Biru, Galmessa Abebe. (2020). Input-output Market Information Access and Methods of Selling Maize and Tomato Products in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida Districts, Ethiopia. Journal of Investment and Management, 9(2), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12
ACS Style
Kifle Degefa; Getachew Biru; Galmessa Abebe. Input-output Market Information Access and Methods of Selling Maize and Tomato Products in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida Districts, Ethiopia. J. Invest. Manag. 2020, 9(2), 47-55. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12
AMA Style
Kifle Degefa, Getachew Biru, Galmessa Abebe. Input-output Market Information Access and Methods of Selling Maize and Tomato Products in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida Districts, Ethiopia. J Invest Manag. 2020;9(2):47-55. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12
@article{10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12, author = {Kifle Degefa and Getachew Biru and Galmessa Abebe}, title = {Input-output Market Information Access and Methods of Selling Maize and Tomato Products in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida Districts, Ethiopia}, journal = {Journal of Investment and Management}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {47-55}, doi = {10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jim.20200902.12}, abstract = {The study is to describe the marketing system of inputs and outputs; identify weather there is marketing system inefficiencies and integration in inputs and outputs of maize and tomato marketing system in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida districts. From the result, there is an information gap with and among producers, Development Agents, input suppliers, traders, and consumers. The majority of the producers preferred cooperatives to sell their products. According to producers’ reported disease, low price of grain, poor market linkage, shortage of chemicals and unlicensed traders were the major challenges in both maize and tomato production. Shortage of inputs, farmers reluctant to buy inputs, high competition unlicensed traders, weak government support, and shortage of storage were the main challenges in input supply while low quality with poor awareness, low supply, unlicensed traders, brokers and demand fluctuations were also major challenges in traders. Enhancing the technical knowledge and skill of farmers, Development Agents, input suppliers, and buyers need the training to provide effective enabling service to increase market efficiency among the actors. Besides, build the capacity of farmer’s cooperatives in value chains of inputs and outputs, considering market-oriented extension service and improving the enabling environment in promoting competition in agribusiness marketing efficiency.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Input-output Market Information Access and Methods of Selling Maize and Tomato Products in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida Districts, Ethiopia AU - Kifle Degefa AU - Getachew Biru AU - Galmessa Abebe Y1 - 2020/08/05 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12 T2 - Journal of Investment and Management JF - Journal of Investment and Management JO - Journal of Investment and Management SP - 47 EP - 55 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7721 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20200902.12 AB - The study is to describe the marketing system of inputs and outputs; identify weather there is marketing system inefficiencies and integration in inputs and outputs of maize and tomato marketing system in Bako Tibe and Guto Gida districts. From the result, there is an information gap with and among producers, Development Agents, input suppliers, traders, and consumers. The majority of the producers preferred cooperatives to sell their products. According to producers’ reported disease, low price of grain, poor market linkage, shortage of chemicals and unlicensed traders were the major challenges in both maize and tomato production. Shortage of inputs, farmers reluctant to buy inputs, high competition unlicensed traders, weak government support, and shortage of storage were the main challenges in input supply while low quality with poor awareness, low supply, unlicensed traders, brokers and demand fluctuations were also major challenges in traders. Enhancing the technical knowledge and skill of farmers, Development Agents, input suppliers, and buyers need the training to provide effective enabling service to increase market efficiency among the actors. Besides, build the capacity of farmer’s cooperatives in value chains of inputs and outputs, considering market-oriented extension service and improving the enabling environment in promoting competition in agribusiness marketing efficiency. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -