Fractures in the elderly population are a major increasing issue for any healthcare institution, associated with the growing life expectancy. Proximal tibial fractures affect the metaphyseal bone with or without articular extension, in 5 to 11% of all tibia fracture. Treatment options such as plate fixation, intramedullary nailing or even primary total knee arthroplasty are accepted valuable options. However, specific age-related risk factors such as osteoporosis, arthritis, multiple comorbidities and soft-tissue impairment shall also be taken in consideration as they may lead to severe complications if not fully understood. Therefore, a hybrid tibio-tibial external fixator may be considered as a valid surgical option for primary and definitive treatment care of these fractures especially if associated with soft-tissue damage. We report a retrospective observational analysis of three cases of closed extra-articular proximal tibia fractures associated with soft-tissue impairment in a geriatric population and treated with a hybrid external fixator (TenXor, Stryker). The fractures were classified according to the AO, as metaphyseal fractures (AO 41A2.1, 41A3.3). The post-operative protocol was standardized, with immediate full weight bearing. Complete consolidation of the fractures was obtained at 6 months. There were no pin tract infection and removal of the material has been done at 6 months. No cut-out of the proximal tibial wires was observed. The primary and definitive care of proximal tibial fractures by a hybrid external fixator appears to be a valuable surgical option in geriatric patients especially when associated with poor soft tissue coverage. The major advantage of this technique, acknowledging the longer bone consolidation process, is to avoid additional insult to the soft tissues. This surgical option gathers further treatment perspectives in the elderly population especially in cases of soft tissue limitations.
Published in | Journal of Surgery (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.js.20210902.18 |
Page(s) | 82-85 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Proximal Tibial Fracture, Metaphyseal Fracture, Geriatric Trauma, Soft-tissue Impairment
[1] | Amin S, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Melton LJ. Trends in Fracture Incidence: A Population-Based Study Over 20 Years. J Bone Miner Res. March 2014; 29 (3): 581-9. |
[2] | Lang G, Cohen B, Bosse M, Kellam J. Early primary total knee replacement for complex proximal tibia fractures in elderly and osteoarthritic patients. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. June 1995; (315): 64-74. |
[3] | Chen F, Huang X, Ya Y, Ma F, Qian Z, Shi J, et al. Finite element analysis of intramedullary nailing and double locking plate for treating extra-articular proximal tibial fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. January 2018; 13. |
[4] | Brooks SE, Peetz AB. Evidence-Based Care of Geriatric Trauma Patients. Surg Clin North Am. October 2017; 97 (5): 1157-74. |
[5] | Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Ekelund J, Juto H, Sundfeldt M, Möller M. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury. November 2018; 49 (11): 2068-74. |
[6] | Kandemir U, Herfat S, Herzog M, Viscogliosi P, Pekmezci M. Fatigue Failure in Extra-Articular Proximal Tibia Fractures: Locking Intramedullary Nail Versus Double Locking Plates—A Biomechanical Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. February 2017; 31 (2): e49-54. |
[7] | Lee S-M, Oh C-W, Oh J-K, Kim J-W, Lee H-J, Chon C-S, et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Operative Methods in the Treatment of Extra-Articular Fracture of the Proximal Tibia. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014; 6 (3): 312. |
[8] | Zhang J, Ebraheim N, Li M, He X, Liu J, Zhu L, et al. External Fixation Using Femoral Less Invasive Stabilization System Plate in Tibial Proximal Metaphyseal Fracture. Clin Orthop Surg. March 2015; 7 (1): 8-14. |
[9] | Vermeire J, ScheerLinck T. Early primary total knee replacement for complex proximal tibia fractures in elderly and osteoarthritic patients. Acta orthopaedica Belgica. 2010; 76 (6): 785. |
[10] | Zura R, Mehta S, Della Rocca GJ, Steen RG. Biological Risk Factors for Nonunion of Bone Fracture. JBJS Rev. May 2016; 4 (1). |
[11] | Kortram K, Bezstarosti H, Metsemakers W-J, Raschke MJ, Van Lieshout EMM, Verhofstad MHJ. Risk factors for infectious complications after open fractures; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2017; 41 (10): 1965-82. |
[12] | Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. Arch Osteoporos. 2013. |
[13] | Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. 235 p. |
[14] | Ibrahim DA, Swenson A, Sassoon A, Fernando ND. Classifications In Brief: The Tscherne Classification of Soft Tissue Injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. February 2017; 475 (2): 560-4. |
[15] | Tscherne H, Oestern HJ. A new classification of soft-tissue damage in open and closed fractures. Unfallheilkunde. March 1982; 85 (3): 111-5. |
[16] | Young MJ, Barrack RL. Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev. February 1994; 23 (2): 149-54. |
[17] | Mallik AR, Covall DJ, Whitelaw GP. Internal versus external fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev. December 1992; 21 (12): 1433-6. |
[18] | Moore TM, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP. Tibial plateau fractures: definition, demographics, treatment rationale, and long-term results of closed traction management or operative reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 1987; 1 (2): 97-119. |
[19] | Dillin L, Slabaugh P. Delayed wound healing, infection, and nonunion following open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plafond fractures. J Trauma. December 1986; 26 (12): 1116-9. |
[20] | Metcalfe D, Hickson CJ, McKee L, Griffin XL. External versus internal fixation for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. December 2015; 16 (4): 275-85. |
[21] | Freedman EL, Johnson EE. Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. June 1995; (315): 25-33. |
[22] | Lang GJ, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. Proximal third tibial shaft fractures. Should they be nailed? Clin Orthop Relat Res. June 1995; (315): 64-74. |
[23] | Tejwani N, Polonet D, Wolinsky PR. Controversies in the Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal and Distal Tibia Fractures: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. October 2014; 22 (10): 665-73. |
[24] | Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA. Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. November 2011; 19 (11): 690-700. |
[25] | Zhao X, Ma J, Ma X, Jiang X, Wang Y, Li F, et al. A meta-analysis of external fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. International Journal of Surgery. March 2017; 39: 65-73. |
[26] | Santy J, Vincent M, Duffield B. The principles of caring for patients with Ilizarov external fixation. Nursing Standard. March 2009; 23 (26): 50-5. |
[27] | Ariffin HM, Mahdi NM, Rhani SA, Baharudin A, Shukur MH. Modified hybrid fixator for high-energy Schatzker V and VI tibial plateau fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. April 2011; 6 (1): 21-6. |
[28] | Catagni MA, Ottaviani G, Maggioni M. Treatment strategies for complex fractures of the tibial plateau with external circular fixation and limited internal fixation. J Trauma. November 2007; 63 (5): 1043-53. |
[29] | Ali AM. Outcomes of open bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with Ilizarov external fixator with or without minimal internal fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. April 2013; 23 (3): 349-55. |
[30] | Marsh JL, Buckwalter J, Gelberman R, Dirschl D, Olson S, Brown T, et al. Articular fractures: does an anatomic reduction really change the result? J Bone Joint Surg Am. July 2002; 84 (7): 1259-71. |
[31] | Berven H, Brix M, Izadpanah K, Kubosch EJ, Schmal H. Comparing case-control study for treatment of proximal tibia fractures with a complete metaphyseal component in two centers with different distinct strategies: fixation with Ilizarov frame or locking plates. J Orthop Surg Res. May 2018. |
APA Style
Yoann Durand, Franziska Kocher, Moritz Tannast, Daniel Petek. (2021). Proximal Extra-articular Tibial Fractures Associated with Soft-tissue Impairment in Geriatric Patients: Definitive Treatment by Hybrid External Fixation. Journal of Surgery, 9(2), 82-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210902.18
ACS Style
Yoann Durand; Franziska Kocher; Moritz Tannast; Daniel Petek. Proximal Extra-articular Tibial Fractures Associated with Soft-tissue Impairment in Geriatric Patients: Definitive Treatment by Hybrid External Fixation. J. Surg. 2021, 9(2), 82-85. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20210902.18
AMA Style
Yoann Durand, Franziska Kocher, Moritz Tannast, Daniel Petek. Proximal Extra-articular Tibial Fractures Associated with Soft-tissue Impairment in Geriatric Patients: Definitive Treatment by Hybrid External Fixation. J Surg. 2021;9(2):82-85. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20210902.18
@article{10.11648/j.js.20210902.18, author = {Yoann Durand and Franziska Kocher and Moritz Tannast and Daniel Petek}, title = {Proximal Extra-articular Tibial Fractures Associated with Soft-tissue Impairment in Geriatric Patients: Definitive Treatment by Hybrid External Fixation}, journal = {Journal of Surgery}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {82-85}, doi = {10.11648/j.js.20210902.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210902.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20210902.18}, abstract = {Fractures in the elderly population are a major increasing issue for any healthcare institution, associated with the growing life expectancy. Proximal tibial fractures affect the metaphyseal bone with or without articular extension, in 5 to 11% of all tibia fracture. Treatment options such as plate fixation, intramedullary nailing or even primary total knee arthroplasty are accepted valuable options. However, specific age-related risk factors such as osteoporosis, arthritis, multiple comorbidities and soft-tissue impairment shall also be taken in consideration as they may lead to severe complications if not fully understood. Therefore, a hybrid tibio-tibial external fixator may be considered as a valid surgical option for primary and definitive treatment care of these fractures especially if associated with soft-tissue damage. We report a retrospective observational analysis of three cases of closed extra-articular proximal tibia fractures associated with soft-tissue impairment in a geriatric population and treated with a hybrid external fixator (TenXor, Stryker). The fractures were classified according to the AO, as metaphyseal fractures (AO 41A2.1, 41A3.3). The post-operative protocol was standardized, with immediate full weight bearing. Complete consolidation of the fractures was obtained at 6 months. There were no pin tract infection and removal of the material has been done at 6 months. No cut-out of the proximal tibial wires was observed. The primary and definitive care of proximal tibial fractures by a hybrid external fixator appears to be a valuable surgical option in geriatric patients especially when associated with poor soft tissue coverage. The major advantage of this technique, acknowledging the longer bone consolidation process, is to avoid additional insult to the soft tissues. This surgical option gathers further treatment perspectives in the elderly population especially in cases of soft tissue limitations.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Proximal Extra-articular Tibial Fractures Associated with Soft-tissue Impairment in Geriatric Patients: Definitive Treatment by Hybrid External Fixation AU - Yoann Durand AU - Franziska Kocher AU - Moritz Tannast AU - Daniel Petek Y1 - 2021/04/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210902.18 DO - 10.11648/j.js.20210902.18 T2 - Journal of Surgery JF - Journal of Surgery JO - Journal of Surgery SP - 82 EP - 85 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0930 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20210902.18 AB - Fractures in the elderly population are a major increasing issue for any healthcare institution, associated with the growing life expectancy. Proximal tibial fractures affect the metaphyseal bone with or without articular extension, in 5 to 11% of all tibia fracture. Treatment options such as plate fixation, intramedullary nailing or even primary total knee arthroplasty are accepted valuable options. However, specific age-related risk factors such as osteoporosis, arthritis, multiple comorbidities and soft-tissue impairment shall also be taken in consideration as they may lead to severe complications if not fully understood. Therefore, a hybrid tibio-tibial external fixator may be considered as a valid surgical option for primary and definitive treatment care of these fractures especially if associated with soft-tissue damage. We report a retrospective observational analysis of three cases of closed extra-articular proximal tibia fractures associated with soft-tissue impairment in a geriatric population and treated with a hybrid external fixator (TenXor, Stryker). The fractures were classified according to the AO, as metaphyseal fractures (AO 41A2.1, 41A3.3). The post-operative protocol was standardized, with immediate full weight bearing. Complete consolidation of the fractures was obtained at 6 months. There were no pin tract infection and removal of the material has been done at 6 months. No cut-out of the proximal tibial wires was observed. The primary and definitive care of proximal tibial fractures by a hybrid external fixator appears to be a valuable surgical option in geriatric patients especially when associated with poor soft tissue coverage. The major advantage of this technique, acknowledging the longer bone consolidation process, is to avoid additional insult to the soft tissues. This surgical option gathers further treatment perspectives in the elderly population especially in cases of soft tissue limitations. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -