Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance

Dewi Asmorowati; Dedy Kristanto; Mia Ferian Helmy; Fanata Yudha; Nur Ilham Tarsila; Sukma Bayu Yusanto

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance

Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, Sukma Bayu Yusanto

Published in International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 5)

Received: 26 October 2022 Accepted: 11 November 2022 Published: 23 November 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.

Published in	International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
Page(s)	115-120
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Fracturing Fluid, Additives, Residue, Proppant Carrying Capacity

References

[1]	Economidies, M. J., and Nolte, K. G. 2000. Reservoir Stimulation. 3rd Edition. Houston: Schlumberger Educational Services.
[2]	Miskimins, J. L. 2020. Hydraulic Fracturing: Fundamentals and Advancements‬. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Richardson, Texas.
[3]	Driweesh, S. M., Al-Atwi, M. A., Malik, A. R., Olarte, J. E., Jauregui, J. A., Bolarinwa, S. O. 2013. Successful Implementation of Zirconate Borate Based Dual Crosslinked Gel and Continuous Mixing System During Proppant Fracturing Treatment in a Complex High-Temperature and High-Pressure Sandstone Gas Reservoir in Saudi Arabia that Exceeded the Well Object. International Petroleum Technology Conference. Beijing, China.
[4]	Azizov, E., Quintero, H. J., Saxton, K., and Sessarego, S. 2015. Carboxymethylcellulose a Cost-Effective Alternative to Guar, CMHPG and Surfactant-Based Fluid Systems. SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
[5]	Hai, Q., Liancheng, R., Wenhao, H., Tingxue, J., and Yiming, Y. 2018. Successful Application of Clean Fracturing Fluid Replacing Guar Gum Fluid to Stimulate Tuffstone in San Jorge Basin, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Argentina. Louisiana.
[6]	Yaritz, J., Stegent, N., Bailey, T., and Fritcher, E. 1997. Development of a Dual Crosslinker Fracturing Fluid System. Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
[7]	Hai, Q., and Liancheng, R. 2018. Successful Application of Clean Fracturing Fluid Replacing Guar Gum Fluid to Stimulate Tuffstonein San Jorge Basin, Argentina. SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control (p. 14). Society of Petroleum Engineers Lafayette, Lousiana, USA.
[8]	Tariq Almubarak, J. H. 2020. Insights on Potential Formation Damage Mechanisms Associated with the Use of Gel Breakers in Hydraulic Fracturing. Polymers, 22.
[9]	Ming, H., Lu, Y., Qiu, X., Shu, Y., and Wang, S. 2016. Development and Field Application of a Novel Cellulose Fracturing Fluid. SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Beijing, China.
[10]	Ming H, Lu, Y. 2016. A Cellulose Fracturing Fluid with Instant Solution and Residue. SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition (p. 7). Society of Petroleum Engineers. Perth, Australia.
[11]	Zhao, G. 2018. Synthesis and Application of Nonionic Polyacrylamide with Controlled Molecular Weight for Fracturing in Low-permeability Oil Reservoirs. Journal of Applied Polymer ScienceVolume 132, Issue 11.
[12]	Ding, Y., Li, Y., Xu, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, F. 2010. Propped Fracturing with a Novel Surface Cross-linked Acid in High Temperature Deep Carbonate Formation. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. (2022). Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 10(5), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Dewi Asmorowati; Dedy Kristanto; Mia Ferian Helmy; Fanata Yudha; Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022, 10(5), 115-120. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022;10(5):115-120. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11,
  author = {Dewi Asmorowati and Dedy Kristanto and Mia Ferian Helmy and Fanata Yudha and Nur Ilham Tarsila and Sukma Bayu Yusanto},
  title = {Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance},
  journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {115-120},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20221005.11},
  abstract = {Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance
AU  - Dewi Asmorowati
AU  - Dedy Kristanto
AU  - Mia Ferian Helmy
AU  - Fanata Yudha
AU  - Nur Ilham Tarsila
AU  - Sukma Bayu Yusanto
Y1  - 2022/11/23
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
SP  - 115
EP  - 120
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
AB  - Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Dewi Asmorowati

Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Dedy Kristanto

Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mia Ferian Helmy

Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Fanata Yudha

Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nur Ilham Tarsila

Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sukma Bayu Yusanto

Fracturing Services, Bukit Apit Bumi Persada Ltd., Bekasi, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. (2022). Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 10(5), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Dewi Asmorowati; Dedy Kristanto; Mia Ferian Helmy; Fanata Yudha; Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022, 10(5), 115-120. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022;10(5):115-120. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11,
  author = {Dewi Asmorowati and Dedy Kristanto and Mia Ferian Helmy and Fanata Yudha and Nur Ilham Tarsila and Sukma Bayu Yusanto},
  title = {Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance},
  journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {115-120},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20221005.11},
  abstract = {Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance
AU  - Dewi Asmorowati
AU  - Dedy Kristanto
AU  - Mia Ferian Helmy
AU  - Fanata Yudha
AU  - Nur Ilham Tarsila
AU  - Sukma Bayu Yusanto
Y1  - 2022/11/23
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
SP  - 115
EP  - 120
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
AB  - Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download