Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan

Salah Khatir Jubarah; Isaac Aleardo Paul

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan

Salah Khatir Jubarah, Isaac Aleardo Paul

Published in Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 9, Issue 1)

Received: 30 November 2020 Accepted: 29 December 2020 Published: 12 January 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Effective and efficient veterinary services in implementing specific disease control measures and disease surveillance, entails monitoring and evaluation system to be integrated into its budgeted policy framework and strategic plan, a system that keeps the directorate of veterinary services in a mode of action-reflection-action. The guiding principles for the envisaged monitoring and evaluation should include, identification and establishment of veterinary services baseline data; adaptation of result-based decisions and management. While it address measurement of performance, data collection and analysis, reporting, reviews and institutional arrangement. The operationalization of monitoring and evaluation framework for the directorate of veterinary services is to be based on the logical approach of inputs, process, output, outcomes and impact indicators. The collected data on each indicator should be analyzed and summarized in the progress reports of the directorate and be reviewed periodically. However, veterinary health projects and nongovernmental organizations should develop their own indicators in a logical frame. Standard data collection and reporting system have to be developed by key stakeholders, however, animal health survey may be disaggregated. Monitoring and evaluation framework for veterinary policy identifies sources for data generation. It suggest that in absence of baseline data, a pilot survey may be undertaken, and that veterinary policy may be assessed under a join implementation review, animal health expenditure review, budgetary and development fund reviews. However, the envisaged monitoring and evaluation framework emphasizes duties and responsibilities of the directorate of veterinary services in generating a quality data, and in establishment of a unit for veterinary statistic which fosters information culture and promote information demand. Furthermore, it undertake progress review, effect prediction and identification of essential policy adjustment, as well as, it measures progress and it determine as to whether veterinary services and animal health actors are meeting their goals or not.

Published in	Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 9, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
Page(s)	1-14
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Policy, Monitoring and Evaluation, Veterinary Services, Indicators

References

[1]	Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries. (2012). Policy Framework and Strategic Plans 2012 – 2016. MARF Republic of South Sudan.
[2]	Cuellar, M. J. (2013). The Nature of Project Success. http://works.bepress.com/michael_cuellar/24.
[3]	Hwang, B. and Lim, E. (2013). ”Critical Success Factors for Key Project Players and Objectives: Case Study of Singapore.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139 (2), 204–215.
[4]	Kamau, C. G. and Bin Mohamed, H. (2015). Efficacy of Monitoring and Evaluation Function in Achieving Project Success in Kenya: A Conceptual Framework. Science Journal of Business and Management. 3 (3): 82-94.
[5]	Mbiti, V. M. and Kiruja, E. (2015). Role of monitoring and evaluation on performance of public organization projects in kenya: a case of kenya meat Commission. International Journal of Innovative Development & Policy Studies. 3 (3): 12-27.
[6]	Craig, B. C., Shaker, R. R. and Das, R. (2018). A review of approaches for monitoring and evaluation of urban climate resilience initiatives. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 20: 23-40.
[7]	National Veterinary Plan. (2012). MARF NVP Republic of South Sudan, 2012 – 2014 (August. 2012).
[8]	MARF, RSS. (2012). First national livestock and fisheries coordination conference on policy framework and strategic plans (2012 – 2016), under the theme: Effective Policy and Strategic Planning for the Development of Livestock and Fisheries Industry in South Sudan. Juba bridge hotel, Juba, 28^th – 31^st may 2012. Conference Proceedings Report.
[9]	Kanisio, J. O., Legge, M. R. K., Nasona, M. G., Samuel, K., Legge, M. S., Penaflor, P. E. and Poleslico, R. V. (2011). The joint baseline survey report on agriculture and animal resources in Southern Sudan. The MAF and MARF Technical Committee. IFAD/EKE.
[10]	OIE. (2012). World Organisation for Animal Health. Terrestrial Animal Health Standard Commission Report. March 2008. Evaluation of Veterinary Services. Terrestrial Manual 7th Edition, 2012. Volumes 1 M. Young, the Technical Writer's Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 198.
[11]	NALEP. (2011). National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy Agricultural and Livestock Extension Task Force. Juba. South Sudan Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries, GRSS.
[12]	Taban, Y. T and Lako, C. L. A. (2012). Assessment of staff distribution and resources allocation in relation to the efficient and effective delivery of veterinary services in the Republic of South Sudan. Comprehensive Final Report. Dierenartsen Veterinaires Zonder Grenzen sans Frontieres Belgium.
[13]	Catley, A. (1999). Monitoring and impact assessment of community-based animal health projectsin Southern Sudan. Towards participatory approaches and methods. A report for Veterinaires Sans Frontieres Belgium and Veterinaires Sans Frontieres Switzerland.
[14]	AU/NEPAD. (2010). The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) Agency of the African Union (AU/NEPAD) www.nepad.org.
[15]	Michael B. Mascia, M. B., Pailler, S., Thieme, M. L., Rowe, A., Bottrill, M. C., Danielsen, F., Geldmann, J., Naidoo, R., Pullin, A. S. and Burgess, N. D. (2014). Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biological Conservation. 169: 28-267.
[16]	Hassan, A. I. (2013). AnInvestigation of Structural Capacityas a Component of Monitoring and Evaluation in Project Success of Road Construction Projects in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences., 3: (8), 443-452.
[17]	Kariungi, S. M. (2014). Determinants of Timely Completion of Projects in Kenya: A Case of Kenya Power and Lighting Company, Thika. ABC Journal of Advanced Research., 3 (2): 9-19.
[18]	Olubode, O. O., Chilonda, Q., Minde, I. and Bhat, Y. (2008). Working Paper 24. Indicators for M&E of agricultural performance and shared goals southern Africa. Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System. www.resakss.org.
[19]	IFAD. (2012). Managing for Impact in Rural development. A Guide for Project M&E. IFAD, International Fund for Agricultural Development. www.ifad.org’.
[20]	WHO. (2010). Monitoring and Evaluation of health systems strengthening. An operational Framework. WHO, Geneva. Oct 2010.
[21]	FAO. (2011). Sustainable animal health and contained animal related human health risks in support of the emerging one-health agenda. Applying lessons learned from highly pathogenic avian influenza in the prevention and containment of major animal diseases and related human health risks. FAO progamme Committee, Hundred and Sixteen Session.www.fao.org.
[22]	Chapman, A. (2014). “Project management, tools, process, plans and project planning tips”. http://www.businessballs.com/project.htm, accessed 8-3.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Salah Khatir Jubarah, Isaac Aleardo Paul. (2021). Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan. Science Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Salah Khatir Jubarah; Isaac Aleardo Paul. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 9(1), 1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Salah Khatir Jubarah, Isaac Aleardo Paul. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan. Sci J Bus Manag. 2021;9(1):1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11,
  author = {Salah Khatir Jubarah and Isaac Aleardo Paul},
  title = {Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan},
  journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
  volume = {9},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-14},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20210901.11},
  abstract = {Effective and efficient veterinary services in implementing specific disease control measures and disease surveillance, entails monitoring and evaluation system to be integrated into its budgeted policy framework and strategic plan, a system that keeps the directorate of veterinary services in a mode of action-reflection-action. The guiding principles for the envisaged monitoring and evaluation should include, identification and establishment of veterinary services baseline data; adaptation of result-based decisions and management. While it address measurement of performance, data collection and analysis, reporting, reviews and institutional arrangement. The operationalization of monitoring and evaluation framework for the directorate of veterinary services is to be based on the logical approach of inputs, process, output, outcomes and impact indicators. The collected data on each indicator should be analyzed and summarized in the progress reports of the directorate and be reviewed periodically. However, veterinary health projects and nongovernmental organizations should develop their own indicators in a logical frame. Standard data collection and reporting system have to be developed by key stakeholders, however, animal health survey may be disaggregated. Monitoring and evaluation framework for veterinary policy identifies sources for data generation. It suggest that in absence of baseline data, a pilot survey may be undertaken, and that veterinary policy may be assessed under a join implementation review, animal health expenditure review, budgetary and development fund reviews. However, the envisaged monitoring and evaluation framework emphasizes duties and responsibilities of the directorate of veterinary services in generating a quality data, and in establishment of a unit for veterinary statistic which fosters information culture and promote information demand. Furthermore, it undertake progress review, effect prediction and identification of essential policy adjustment, as well as, it measures progress and it determine as to whether veterinary services and animal health actors are meeting their goals or not.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan
AU  - Salah Khatir Jubarah
AU  - Isaac Aleardo Paul
Y1  - 2021/01/12
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
SP  - 1
EP  - 14
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0634
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
AB  - Effective and efficient veterinary services in implementing specific disease control measures and disease surveillance, entails monitoring and evaluation system to be integrated into its budgeted policy framework and strategic plan, a system that keeps the directorate of veterinary services in a mode of action-reflection-action. The guiding principles for the envisaged monitoring and evaluation should include, identification and establishment of veterinary services baseline data; adaptation of result-based decisions and management. While it address measurement of performance, data collection and analysis, reporting, reviews and institutional arrangement. The operationalization of monitoring and evaluation framework for the directorate of veterinary services is to be based on the logical approach of inputs, process, output, outcomes and impact indicators. The collected data on each indicator should be analyzed and summarized in the progress reports of the directorate and be reviewed periodically. However, veterinary health projects and nongovernmental organizations should develop their own indicators in a logical frame. Standard data collection and reporting system have to be developed by key stakeholders, however, animal health survey may be disaggregated. Monitoring and evaluation framework for veterinary policy identifies sources for data generation. It suggest that in absence of baseline data, a pilot survey may be undertaken, and that veterinary policy may be assessed under a join implementation review, animal health expenditure review, budgetary and development fund reviews. However, the envisaged monitoring and evaluation framework emphasizes duties and responsibilities of the directorate of veterinary services in generating a quality data, and in establishment of a unit for veterinary statistic which fosters information culture and promote information demand. Furthermore, it undertake progress review, effect prediction and identification of essential policy adjustment, as well as, it measures progress and it determine as to whether veterinary services and animal health actors are meeting their goals or not.
VL  - 9
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Salah Khatir Jubarah

Department of Animal Production, School of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, Juba, South Sudan
Isaac Aleardo Paul

DG State Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Resources, Torit, South Sudan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Salah Khatir Jubarah, Isaac Aleardo Paul. (2021). Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan. Science Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Salah Khatir Jubarah; Isaac Aleardo Paul. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 9(1), 1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Salah Khatir Jubarah, Isaac Aleardo Paul. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan. Sci J Bus Manag. 2021;9(1):1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11,
  author = {Salah Khatir Jubarah and Isaac Aleardo Paul},
  title = {Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan},
  journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
  volume = {9},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-14},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20210901.11},
  abstract = {Effective and efficient veterinary services in implementing specific disease control measures and disease surveillance, entails monitoring and evaluation system to be integrated into its budgeted policy framework and strategic plan, a system that keeps the directorate of veterinary services in a mode of action-reflection-action. The guiding principles for the envisaged monitoring and evaluation should include, identification and establishment of veterinary services baseline data; adaptation of result-based decisions and management. While it address measurement of performance, data collection and analysis, reporting, reviews and institutional arrangement. The operationalization of monitoring and evaluation framework for the directorate of veterinary services is to be based on the logical approach of inputs, process, output, outcomes and impact indicators. The collected data on each indicator should be analyzed and summarized in the progress reports of the directorate and be reviewed periodically. However, veterinary health projects and nongovernmental organizations should develop their own indicators in a logical frame. Standard data collection and reporting system have to be developed by key stakeholders, however, animal health survey may be disaggregated. Monitoring and evaluation framework for veterinary policy identifies sources for data generation. It suggest that in absence of baseline data, a pilot survey may be undertaken, and that veterinary policy may be assessed under a join implementation review, animal health expenditure review, budgetary and development fund reviews. However, the envisaged monitoring and evaluation framework emphasizes duties and responsibilities of the directorate of veterinary services in generating a quality data, and in establishment of a unit for veterinary statistic which fosters information culture and promote information demand. Furthermore, it undertake progress review, effect prediction and identification of essential policy adjustment, as well as, it measures progress and it determine as to whether veterinary services and animal health actors are meeting their goals or not.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Veterinary Policy: A Case of Veterinary Services in South Sudan
AU  - Salah Khatir Jubarah
AU  - Isaac Aleardo Paul
Y1  - 2021/01/12
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
SP  - 1
EP  - 14
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0634
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210901.11
AB  - Effective and efficient veterinary services in implementing specific disease control measures and disease surveillance, entails monitoring and evaluation system to be integrated into its budgeted policy framework and strategic plan, a system that keeps the directorate of veterinary services in a mode of action-reflection-action. The guiding principles for the envisaged monitoring and evaluation should include, identification and establishment of veterinary services baseline data; adaptation of result-based decisions and management. While it address measurement of performance, data collection and analysis, reporting, reviews and institutional arrangement. The operationalization of monitoring and evaluation framework for the directorate of veterinary services is to be based on the logical approach of inputs, process, output, outcomes and impact indicators. The collected data on each indicator should be analyzed and summarized in the progress reports of the directorate and be reviewed periodically. However, veterinary health projects and nongovernmental organizations should develop their own indicators in a logical frame. Standard data collection and reporting system have to be developed by key stakeholders, however, animal health survey may be disaggregated. Monitoring and evaluation framework for veterinary policy identifies sources for data generation. It suggest that in absence of baseline data, a pilot survey may be undertaken, and that veterinary policy may be assessed under a join implementation review, animal health expenditure review, budgetary and development fund reviews. However, the envisaged monitoring and evaluation framework emphasizes duties and responsibilities of the directorate of veterinary services in generating a quality data, and in establishment of a unit for veterinary statistic which fosters information culture and promote information demand. Furthermore, it undertake progress review, effect prediction and identification of essential policy adjustment, as well as, it measures progress and it determine as to whether veterinary services and animal health actors are meeting their goals or not.
VL  - 9
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download