The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is widely applied and it is playing a significant role as a tool for organizational performance evaluation and strategic management. With the increasing emphasis on the concept of green development, in addition to considering the impact of the environment on business performance and development, the BSC must also consider the impact of business performance and development on the environment. In this paper, based on the traditional BSC, I construct the Green Balanced Scorecard Model (GBSCM) with a new “environment and green” dimension, raising it to the same level as the other four dimensions. In turn, I divide the “environment and green” dimension into internal and external environments, soft and hard environments, and analyze it in terms of time and space dimensions, as well as its connotation and indicator composition. I extend the original internal processes to the outside of the organization and expand them into process dimension. Also, I extend the finance into value process and enhance it to form a sustainable GBSCM. This model can provide a thinking guidance model for green and sustainable enterprise development. In the GBSCM, the customer dimension is drawn at the top, indicating that the customer has the highest priority and that customer needs comes first. The learning and growth dimension and the environment and green dimension are at the bottom, indicating that based on the environment and green development, continuous learning and growth is the basis and foundation of sustainable development of enterprises. The process is where the business exists and the value is where the process results, so they are in the middle. Process, value, learning and growth, environment and green complement each other, so companies have their bread buttered on both sides. Enterprises learn and grow according to the concept of green environment and sustainable development. Vision and strategy pentagram points at the five dimensions of the enterprise, guiding the enterprise to maintain dynamic and balanced development in the coordinates of time and space, and then achieve the success of the five dimensions.
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23 |
| Page(s) | 367-375 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Green Balanced Scorecard Model, Green Development, Environmental Management, Enterprise Responsibility, Value, Soft Environment, Hard Environment
| [1] | Robert, S., Kaplan, David, P., Norton. (1992). The Balanced scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, (1/2): 71-79. |
| [2] | Robert, S., Kaplan, David, P., Norton. (1993). Putting the Balanced scorecard to Work. Harvard Business Review, (9/10): 134-147. |
| [3] | Robert, S., Kaplan, David, P., Norton. (1996). Using the Balanced scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, (1/2): 150-161. |
| [4] | Robert, S., Kaplan, David, P., Norton. (2000). Having Trouble with Your Strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, (9/10): 167-76, 202. |
| [5] | Robert, S., Kaplan, David, P., Norton. (2001). The Strategy – focused Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. |
| [6] | Hanne Norreklit. (2003). The balanced scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard. Accounting, 28 (6): 591-619. |
| [7] | Anthony, A., Atkinson, John H., Waterhouse, Robert B., Wells A., (1997). Stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38 (3): 25-37. |
| [8] | Gopal K., Kanji, Patricia Moura e Sa., (2002). Kanji’s business score card. Total Quality Management, 13 (7): 13-27. |
| [9] | Michael C., Jensen, (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. European Financial Management, 7 (3): 297-317. |
| [10] | Marshall W., Meyer, (2002). Rethinking performance measurement: Beyond the balanced scorecard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [11] | Christopher D., Ittner, David F., Larcker, Marshall W., Meyer, (1997). Performance, compensation, and the balanced scorecard. University of Pennsylavania, 11 (1): 1-57. |
| [12] | Mark L., Frigo, Kip R., Krumwiede. (2000). The balanced scorecard. Strategic Finance, 67 (4): 712-736. |
| [13] | Zheng Liqun, Bi Lifeng & Xia Qing. (2009). Enterprise integrated environmental performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard and green EVA. Statistics and Decision. 07: 167-169. (In Chinese). |
| [14] | Song Ziyi & Zou Yuna. (2010). Application of Balanced scorecard in Corporate Environmental Performance Evaluation. Economic Review Journal. 11: 102-105. (In Chinese). |
| [15] | Shi Xinghui. (2010, February 12). Green Balanced scorecard. China Petrochemical News, p. 7. (In Chinese). |
| [16] | Sui Jing. (2011). The Strategic Management Analysis of the Balanced scorecard of Embedding Environmental Responsibility. Science and Technology Management Research, 8: 213-218. (In Chinese). |
| [17] | Zhu Jihong. (2008). The application of environment performance indicators in the balanced scorecard. Communication of Finance and Accounting (Financing Version). 04: 122-123. (In Chinese). |
| [18] | Wei Xinyu. (2012). Construction of a balanced scorecard based on the concept of sustainability. Friends of Accounting 16: 42-45. (In Chinese). |
| [19] | Li Yuan. (2012). Management (Stephen. P. Robbins). Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (In Chinese). |
| [20] | Zhou Danduo. (2000) Management. Beijing: Higher Education Press. (In Chinese). |
| [21] | Zhao Lihong, Ren Hongyan. (2002). Economic analysis of corporate environmental pollution. Commercial Research. 23: 62-63. (In Chinese). |
| [22] | Feng Qian & Duan Xianming. (2009). Analysis of consumers' purchase decision-making caused by corporate environmental Responsibility. Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University (Social Sciences). 04: 22-26. (In Chinese). |
| [23] | Shen Hongbo, Xie Yue, Chen Zhengrong. (2012). Environmental protection, corporate social responsibility and its market response—Case study based on the environmental pollution incident of Zijin Mining Group Co. China Industrial Economics. 01: 141-151. (In Chinese). |
| [24] | Gao Guilin. (2005). Research on the Environmental Responsibility of Companies. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House. (In Chinese). |
| [25] | Gao Guilin. (2008). On the jurisprudential basis of corporate environmental responsibility [J]. Gansu Theory Research, 02: 99-104. (In Chinese). |
| [26] | Yang Yi, Li Yuxiaolu & Shen Hongtao. (2011). Green financial policies, corporate governance and environmental disclosure: a case study of 502 listed Firms in Heavy Pollution Industry. Finance and Trade Research. 05: 31-139. (In Chinese). |
| [27] | Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R., (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. 1-17. |
| [28] | Zhou Hong, Li Zaiqing. (2013). To promote environmental management efficiency by environment certification system. Environment and Sustainable Development. 02: 100-103. (In Chinese). |
| [29] | Chen Yongzheng, Jia Xingke, Li Jiguang. (2005). On the essence, condition of formation of CSR &Its Form. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition). 03: 34-42. (In Chinese). |
| [30] | Zhang zhaoguo, Zhang chi, Pei Xiao. Research on Environmental Management System Certification and Corporate Environmental Performance Chinese Journal of Management [J] Vol. 17, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1043-1051. doi 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.07.011. (In Chinese). |
| [31] | Wu Jianfeng, Ye Chengang. (2019). A study on the effectiveness of environmental Management System Certification Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies [J]. Accounting communication, 25: 17-21. (In Chinese). |
| [32] | Lei Zhanbo, Shi Zeyuan. (2017). Research on process model of organizational human resource management based on the system engineering methodology. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences). 03: 193-197. (In Chinese). |
| [33] | Lei Zhanbo, Li Qiongyao. Research on Organizational Human Resources Knowledge Structure Model Based on the Perspective of System Engineering Methodology. Social Sciences. Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021, pp. 48-57. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211002.12. |
| [34] | Gao Liangmou. (2015). Advanced Course of Management. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press. 445-449. (In Chinese). |
| [35] | Malina, Du Yusheng. (2018). The impact of institutional drive and corporate strategy on environmental performance [J]. Social Science Front, 08: 250-254. (In Chinese). |
APA Style
Lei Zhanbo. (2021). A Study of Green Balanced Scorecard Model. Social Sciences, 10(6), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23
ACS Style
Lei Zhanbo. A Study of Green Balanced Scorecard Model. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(6), 367-375. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23
AMA Style
Lei Zhanbo. A Study of Green Balanced Scorecard Model. Soc Sci. 2021;10(6):367-375. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23,
author = {Lei Zhanbo},
title = {A Study of Green Balanced Scorecard Model},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {10},
number = {6},
pages = {367-375},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20211006.23},
abstract = {The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is widely applied and it is playing a significant role as a tool for organizational performance evaluation and strategic management. With the increasing emphasis on the concept of green development, in addition to considering the impact of the environment on business performance and development, the BSC must also consider the impact of business performance and development on the environment. In this paper, based on the traditional BSC, I construct the Green Balanced Scorecard Model (GBSCM) with a new “environment and green” dimension, raising it to the same level as the other four dimensions. In turn, I divide the “environment and green” dimension into internal and external environments, soft and hard environments, and analyze it in terms of time and space dimensions, as well as its connotation and indicator composition. I extend the original internal processes to the outside of the organization and expand them into process dimension. Also, I extend the finance into value process and enhance it to form a sustainable GBSCM. This model can provide a thinking guidance model for green and sustainable enterprise development. In the GBSCM, the customer dimension is drawn at the top, indicating that the customer has the highest priority and that customer needs comes first. The learning and growth dimension and the environment and green dimension are at the bottom, indicating that based on the environment and green development, continuous learning and growth is the basis and foundation of sustainable development of enterprises. The process is where the business exists and the value is where the process results, so they are in the middle. Process, value, learning and growth, environment and green complement each other, so companies have their bread buttered on both sides. Enterprises learn and grow according to the concept of green environment and sustainable development. Vision and strategy pentagram points at the five dimensions of the enterprise, guiding the enterprise to maintain dynamic and balanced development in the coordinates of time and space, and then achieve the success of the five dimensions.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Study of Green Balanced Scorecard Model AU - Lei Zhanbo Y1 - 2021/12/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 367 EP - 375 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.23 AB - The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is widely applied and it is playing a significant role as a tool for organizational performance evaluation and strategic management. With the increasing emphasis on the concept of green development, in addition to considering the impact of the environment on business performance and development, the BSC must also consider the impact of business performance and development on the environment. In this paper, based on the traditional BSC, I construct the Green Balanced Scorecard Model (GBSCM) with a new “environment and green” dimension, raising it to the same level as the other four dimensions. In turn, I divide the “environment and green” dimension into internal and external environments, soft and hard environments, and analyze it in terms of time and space dimensions, as well as its connotation and indicator composition. I extend the original internal processes to the outside of the organization and expand them into process dimension. Also, I extend the finance into value process and enhance it to form a sustainable GBSCM. This model can provide a thinking guidance model for green and sustainable enterprise development. In the GBSCM, the customer dimension is drawn at the top, indicating that the customer has the highest priority and that customer needs comes first. The learning and growth dimension and the environment and green dimension are at the bottom, indicating that based on the environment and green development, continuous learning and growth is the basis and foundation of sustainable development of enterprises. The process is where the business exists and the value is where the process results, so they are in the middle. Process, value, learning and growth, environment and green complement each other, so companies have their bread buttered on both sides. Enterprises learn and grow according to the concept of green environment and sustainable development. Vision and strategy pentagram points at the five dimensions of the enterprise, guiding the enterprise to maintain dynamic and balanced development in the coordinates of time and space, and then achieve the success of the five dimensions. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -
Email: