An efficient in vitro protocol for shoot regeneration and production of multiple shoots of Cissampelos pareira (L) was developed. In the present study, the effect of different carbon sources, sucrose, fructose, maltose and glucose was investigated on in vitro shoot regeneration by using axillary bud of Cissampelos pareira (L). The frequency, growth and multiplication rate were highly influenced by the type and concentration of carbon sources used. The highest number of shoots (8.06±0.11) was observed on MS medium supplemented with 2% fructose and along with BAP 1.0mg/l and NAA 0.5mg/l and regeneration frequency 95%. The least number of shoots were obtained on MS medium supplemented with 4% maltose and (3.4±0.10) shoots and glucose (3.26±0.11). Among the different carbon sources used in the present study, fructose 2% proved to be a better choice for multiple shoot regeneration followed by Sucrose, maltose, and glucose from axillary bud explants of Cissampelos pareira. In vitro shoots were then excised from the shoot clumps and transferred to the rooting medium containing NAA, IBA (0.5-3.0mg/l). The well-rooted plantlets were then separated from the culture tubes and transferred into sterile soil and vermiculate (1:1) in the greenhouse. Finally, the hardened plants were transferred to the field environment for utmost survivability.
Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11 |
Page(s) | 131-136 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Axillary Bud Explants, Carbon Sources, BAP-6-Benzyl Amino Purine, NAA-1-Napthalene Acetic Acid, Micro Propagation, Cissampelos pareira
[1] | Ganguly M, Borthakur MK, Devi N & Mahanta R. (2007) Antifertility activity of themethanolic leaf extract of Cissampelos pareira in female albino mice. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 111: 688–691. |
[2] | Amresh G, ReddyGD, Rao CV & Shirwaikar A. (2004) Ethnomedical value ofCissampelos pareira extract in experimentally induced diarrhoea. Acta Pharmaceutica, 54: 27–25. |
[3] | Amresh G, Singh PN & Rao CV. (2007) Antinociceptive and antiarthritic activity of Cissampelos pareiraroots. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 111: 531–536. |
[4] | Amresh G, Reddy GD, Rao CV & Singh PN. (2007) Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Cissampelos pareira root in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 110: 526–531. |
[5] | Bullough C et al (1982) Herbal medicines used by traditional birth attendants in Malawi. Trop. Geograph. Med. 34: 81-85. |
[6] | Tiwari KC et al (1982). Folklore information from Assam for family planning and birth control. Int. J. Crude Drug Res 20 (3): 133-7. |
[7] | Feng PC, et al (1962) Pharmacological screening of some West Indian medicinal plants. J. Pharm Pharmacol, 14: 556–61. |
[8] | Vishwanath Jannu, Sai Vishal D, Ranjith Babu V, Harisha B, Ravi Chandra Sekhara Reddy D (2011) Antidiabetic activity of hydro-alcoholic extract of cissampelos pareira linn. Leaves in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology. Dec-2011, Vol. 3, Issue No. 4, 3601-3611. |
[9] | Lipavska, H., Konradova, H (2004) Somatic embryogenesis in conifers: the role of carbohydrate metabolism. In vitro cellular & Developmental Biology. 40: 23. |
[10] | A. M. Gurva and K. V. Billore (2008) In vitro propagation of patha, (Cissampelos pareira L.), Journal of Drug Research in Ayurveda & Siddha, Vol. 29 (1-2), 39-46. |
[11] | C. M. Narendra Reddy, P. V. Chaithanya Lakshmi, V. N. Swetha Prasuna, M. Raja Gopal and B. Srinivas (2019,) An Efficient Shoot regeneration via indirect organogenesis –A highly Recalcitrant Species of Cissampelos pareira (L.). Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology (PTC & BJ), Vol. 29 & No. 2 In press. |
[12] | De paiwa Neto, V. B. and Otoni, W. C. (2003) Carbon sources and their Osmotic potential in Plant tissue culture. Scientia Horticulturae, 97: 193-202. |
[13] | Rolland, F., Moore, B., Sheen, J. (2002) Sugar sensing and signalling in plants. Plant cellReports. 14: 185-205. |
[14] | Azar, A. M., Kazemiani, S. (2011) Effect of carbon source and hydrolyzed casein on callus and shoot induction in Hypericum perforatum cv. Helos. International Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic plants. 1 (3): 313-318. |
[15] | Faria, R. T., Rodrigues, F. N., Oliveira, L. V. R., Muller, C. (2004) In vitro Dendrobium nobile plant growth and rooting in different sucrose concentrations. Horticultura Brasileira. 22: 780-783. |
[16] | Aloni, R. (1980) Role of auxin and sucrose in the differentiation of sieve and tracheary elements in plant tissue culture. Planta. 150: 255-258. |
[17] | Bhojwani S S, Rajdan M K (1996) Plant tissue culture: theory and Practice, a revised Edition. Elsevier, Netherland, 47-48. |
[18] | Gauchan, D. P. (2012) Effect of different sugars on shoot regeneration of maize Zea mays (L.). Kathmandu University. Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 8: 119-124. |
[19] | Thapa R, Dhakal D, Gauchan DP (2007) Effect of different sugars on shoot induction in CV. Basmati. Kathmandu University, J. Sci Eng Tech., 1: 1-4. |
[20] | Smith, C., Lea, P. J., Leegood, R. C. (1995) Carbohydrate chemistry, Plant Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. |
[21] | Lemos, E. E. P., Baker, D. A. (1998) Shoot regeneration response to carbon source on intermodal explants of Annona muricata (L.). Journal of plant growth Regulation. 25: 105-112. |
[22] | Lu, C. Y., Vasil, V., Vasil, I. K. (1983) Improved efficiency of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in tissue culture of Zea mays. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 66: 285-289. |
[23] | Thompson, M., Thorpe, T. (1987) Metabolic and non-metabolic roles of carbohydrates, In Bonga, J. M., Durzan, D. J. (Eds.), Cell and tissue culture in forestry. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht. pp 89-112. |
[24] | Chu, C. C., Hill, R. D., Brule-Babel, A. I. (1990) High frequency of pollen embryoid formation and plant regeneration in Triticum aestivum (L.) on monosaccharide containing media. Plant Science. 66: 255-262. |
[25] | Strickland S. G., Nichol J. W., Stuart D. A. (1987) Effect of carbohydrate source on Alfalfaembryogenesis. Plant Science. 48: 113-121. |
[26] | Murashige Toshio, Folke Skoog (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia plantarum 15: 473-497. |
[27] | Kozai T, (1991) Micropropagation under photoautotrophic conditions. – In: Debergh PC and Zimmerman RH, (eds) Micro propagation Technology and Application. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 447-469. |
[28] | Preethi, D., and Naidu, C. V (2011) Carbohydrate concentration influences in vitro plant regeneration in Stevia. Journal of phytology, 3: 61-64. |
[29] | Preethi, D., Shanmukh Anand, P., Hemadri Reddy, S., Jeevankumar, S. P., Josthna, P., Naidu C. V (2008) In vitro plant regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana. Journal of Tropical Medicinal plants. 9 (1): 71-76. |
[30] | K. Harathi, G. Geetha and C. V. Naidu (2016) Effect of silver nitrate and different carbon sources on in vitro shoot multiplication of sphaeranthus indicus (Linn.)-an important antijaundice medicinal plant. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. Vol. 6, Issue, 1, pp. 185-192, Jan-Mar-2016. |
[31] | Sudhasri purna G et al., (2016) Effect of silver nitrate and various sugars on in vitro plant regeneration of marsilea quadrifolia (L.). International Journal of Recent Scientific Research Vol. 7, Issue, 7, pp. 12696-12700, July 2016. |
[32] | V. N. Swetha Prasuna & B. Srinivas (2016) Role of different carbon sources on in vitro micropropagation of oxalis corniculata. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences. Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 98-104, JUL-SEP, 2016. |
[33] | Sujana, P., Naidu, C. V. (2011) Impact of different carbohydrates on high-frequency plant regeneration from axillary buds of Mentha piperita (L.)- An important multiple medicinal plants. Journal of phytology. 3 (5): 14-18. |
[34] | Sridhar, T. M., Naidu, C. V. (2011) Effect of different carbon sources on in vitro shoot regeneration of Solanum nigrum (L) - An important antiulcer medicinal plant. Journal of phytology. 3 (2): 78-82. |
[35] | Anwar Hussain Md., Taslim Hussain Md., Raihan Ali Md., Mahabubur Rahman S. M. (2005): Effect of different carbon sources on In vitro regeneration of Indian pennywort Centella asiatica (L.) Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 8: 963-965. |
[36] | Pierik, R. L. M. (1987): In vitro culture of higher plants, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht. pp 321-342. |
[37] | Shin, K. S., Chakrabarty, D., Paek, K. Y. (2002) Sprouting rate, change of carbohydrate contents and related enzymes during cold treatment of lily bulblets regenerated in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 96: 195-204. |
[38] | Hisashi Harada., Yausuhiro Murai. (1996). Micropropagation of Prunus mume koehne. Plant cell, Tissue, and organ culture. 40 (2): 159-167. |
APA Style
Cingithalam Munaswamy Reddy Narendra Reddy, Palyam Venkatesh Chaithanya Lakshmi, Varagiri Narayanachetty Swetha Prasuna, Mustrahally Raja Gopal, Gunda Sudhasri Purna, et al. (2019). Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in vitro Shoot Regeneration and Multiplication of Cissampelos pareira (L.) - An Important Medicinal Plant. Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(6), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11
ACS Style
Cingithalam Munaswamy Reddy Narendra Reddy; Palyam Venkatesh Chaithanya Lakshmi; Varagiri Narayanachetty Swetha Prasuna; Mustrahally Raja Gopal; Gunda Sudhasri Purna, et al. Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in vitro Shoot Regeneration and Multiplication of Cissampelos pareira (L.) - An Important Medicinal Plant. J. Plant Sci. 2019, 7(6), 131-136. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11
AMA Style
Cingithalam Munaswamy Reddy Narendra Reddy, Palyam Venkatesh Chaithanya Lakshmi, Varagiri Narayanachetty Swetha Prasuna, Mustrahally Raja Gopal, Gunda Sudhasri Purna, et al. Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in vitro Shoot Regeneration and Multiplication of Cissampelos pareira (L.) - An Important Medicinal Plant. J Plant Sci. 2019;7(6):131-136. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11
@article{10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11, author = {Cingithalam Munaswamy Reddy Narendra Reddy and Palyam Venkatesh Chaithanya Lakshmi and Varagiri Narayanachetty Swetha Prasuna and Mustrahally Raja Gopal and Gunda Sudhasri Purna and Bathula Srinivas}, title = {Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in vitro Shoot Regeneration and Multiplication of Cissampelos pareira (L.) - An Important Medicinal Plant}, journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {6}, pages = {131-136}, doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20190706.11}, abstract = {An efficient in vitro protocol for shoot regeneration and production of multiple shoots of Cissampelos pareira (L) was developed. In the present study, the effect of different carbon sources, sucrose, fructose, maltose and glucose was investigated on in vitro shoot regeneration by using axillary bud of Cissampelos pareira (L). The frequency, growth and multiplication rate were highly influenced by the type and concentration of carbon sources used. The highest number of shoots (8.06±0.11) was observed on MS medium supplemented with 2% fructose and along with BAP 1.0mg/l and NAA 0.5mg/l and regeneration frequency 95%. The least number of shoots were obtained on MS medium supplemented with 4% maltose and (3.4±0.10) shoots and glucose (3.26±0.11). Among the different carbon sources used in the present study, fructose 2% proved to be a better choice for multiple shoot regeneration followed by Sucrose, maltose, and glucose from axillary bud explants of Cissampelos pareira. In vitro shoots were then excised from the shoot clumps and transferred to the rooting medium containing NAA, IBA (0.5-3.0mg/l). The well-rooted plantlets were then separated from the culture tubes and transferred into sterile soil and vermiculate (1:1) in the greenhouse. Finally, the hardened plants were transferred to the field environment for utmost survivability.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Different Carbon Sources on in vitro Shoot Regeneration and Multiplication of Cissampelos pareira (L.) - An Important Medicinal Plant AU - Cingithalam Munaswamy Reddy Narendra Reddy AU - Palyam Venkatesh Chaithanya Lakshmi AU - Varagiri Narayanachetty Swetha Prasuna AU - Mustrahally Raja Gopal AU - Gunda Sudhasri Purna AU - Bathula Srinivas Y1 - 2019/10/28 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 131 EP - 136 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20190706.11 AB - An efficient in vitro protocol for shoot regeneration and production of multiple shoots of Cissampelos pareira (L) was developed. In the present study, the effect of different carbon sources, sucrose, fructose, maltose and glucose was investigated on in vitro shoot regeneration by using axillary bud of Cissampelos pareira (L). The frequency, growth and multiplication rate were highly influenced by the type and concentration of carbon sources used. The highest number of shoots (8.06±0.11) was observed on MS medium supplemented with 2% fructose and along with BAP 1.0mg/l and NAA 0.5mg/l and regeneration frequency 95%. The least number of shoots were obtained on MS medium supplemented with 4% maltose and (3.4±0.10) shoots and glucose (3.26±0.11). Among the different carbon sources used in the present study, fructose 2% proved to be a better choice for multiple shoot regeneration followed by Sucrose, maltose, and glucose from axillary bud explants of Cissampelos pareira. In vitro shoots were then excised from the shoot clumps and transferred to the rooting medium containing NAA, IBA (0.5-3.0mg/l). The well-rooted plantlets were then separated from the culture tubes and transferred into sterile soil and vermiculate (1:1) in the greenhouse. Finally, the hardened plants were transferred to the field environment for utmost survivability. VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -